<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/7082085456239121411?origin\x3dhttp://artivate.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

2010年5月10日

第7堂课 Lesson 7

艺树人在这堂课继续斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基的演员训练。

我们在上一堂课结束后,便各自回去搜索人物会用的东西,会看的杂志,会到的地方等。



最好玩的是,各组选了一个动物做为人物的象征。我们看了看这些动物的状态,行为等,再从而创造这个人物,赋予他生命。当然,动物只是灵感的来源,我们也必需考虑到编剧设下的框架,让人物在框架里活起来,而非凭空想象。

例如,仓鼠会习惯性地不断重复着同一个动作的,我们便可用这个特征想象剧中的母亲是怎样不断重复地快速打着计算机,或是罗嗦地念她的家人。



问题来了,为什么是动物?

动物有着较简单的社会结构,而且仍保留一定的野性。它们是很好的灵感来源,让创作空间更大!相反的,若我们选择传奇性的动物,如龙,凤等 (甚至鱼尾师),它们的动作是纯想象的,或者像鱼尾狮那般静止的,我们便无法确切地有个联想,创作空间也就变小了。




重要的另一点是,我们不需要用心理状态和动物做联想,而是从形体上进行创作。

这和我以前在中学做演员时,其实有很大的差别。以前,导演们总是通过人物的心理状态导戏,又常常让我们培养感情之类的。
实际上,一个人物更需要清楚的是。。。他要的是什么? 什么东西在组绕他?若他做了一个动作他的动机是什么?

斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基也有一个理论,叫 The Magic "IF"!如果你是那个人物,在那种情况下你这个人物会做什么?而不是身为演员的你,在那种情况下会做些什么。这点和这个人物的背景,家庭环境等有着很大的关系,所以了解这个人物的真实资料,他对自己的看法和别人对他的看法才会是必做的功课!


分享完毕后,我们便和家具互动了!在这个空间里,我们胡乱摆放了一些家具和人物会用到的东西,开始熟悉它们,和它们互动。

你们也可以试试这个简单的活动。在一个你熟悉的空间里走动,喊停时,大家停下脚步然后把眼睛闭上。说出这个空间里有的某一样东西,大家尝试闭着眼指向那个东西。手指指向那样物品的方向必需是精准的。看看你有多准吧!

这个活动能测验与提高你对你存在的空间的敏感度!




For this lesson, ARTivate continues with our Stanislavski's actor training, where we continue building the characters.

Besides searching for what the characters wear, use, read and go, we also look for an animal to signify our characters.

Through the behaviour of these animals, we can then relate and be inspired to create movements for our characters. However, do note that these are just resources and inspirations needed for creating and filling up the character. We should not be searching for an animal which fits the character exactly and end up playing the animal on stage.

The reason for choosing animals is that they are less socialised and retain a certain level of wildness (even for the domesticated animals). Hence they serve as good inspiration and allows imagination when creating a character.

Another important point is, try not to relate the psychological state of the character to that of the animal, as there should not be too much psychological analysis of the character.

It's because when building a character, it is unnecessary to know his emotions at those times. Instead, we should know what the character wants, what is blocking him from getting what he wants, what is his motive in this action, is it to persuade or to threaten?

Stanislavski's Magic "IF" is then important, as we look at "If you are the character, under that circumstances, what will you do?" instead of what you as an actor will do under those circumstances. To know what the character will do, we have to know his biographical data, how he looks at himself and how others looks at him etc.. So know you understand why it is so important to do those work when building a character!



陈玮婷  

0 条评论

0 条评论:

发表评论

订阅 博文评论 [Atom]

<< 主页


关于我们

艺树人

博客

过往镜头

你听说了吗?

我们的伙伴

时光机

串串门子

赞助商




Photobucket